Geek-it

Rose McGowan was probably traumatized during high school. She probably constantly found herself wearing the same thing as everybody else, and now that she’s a star, uses that power to maintain balance. And not any kind of balance, color balance! She warned her female co-stars several times not to wear red to the LA premiere of ‘Grindhouse’, so her dress wouldn’t be upstaged. A source says:

"It caused quite a stir. The feeling is she's self-obsessed." Among the beauties ordered to do without red were Rosario Dawson, Jordan Ladd and Sydney Tamiia Poitier. But McGowan was in for a rude surprise when two minor cast members, twins Elise and Electra Avellan, paraded into the theater in bright red outfits. "It was basically a '[Bleep] you!' to Rose," said the source.

Too bad her dress actually looked good. It would have been ironic if she would have showed up wearing something stupid! Ironic, but oh how amusing!

Good news on the work front.Well this is what I'm going to change next the dog insurance part

Cristina Aguilera has a weird affinity for orange. Or maybe she’s just colorblind, and orange is just gray to her. Regardless, she always seems to be a few shades more orange than the normal people. I don’t get it, was there a sale of orange make-up and tanner? Or does she just lack taste and takes every vulgar thought she gets to the extreme? Or both? Possible explanations, but she will always be a mystery! I mean, showed up to the Nylon celebration looking fairly decent, and then just a day later she was spotted leaving her hotel in NYC looking … well, let’s just say orange goo doesn’t need a famous face operation! Aguilera fixed it so they became impossible to tell apart!

So the BBC is announcing that Tony Blair could soon be announcing his retirement from Number 10.  It’s about time.  It’s a pity he couldn’t just leave office today and allow someone take his place that can start to lower our national debt again instead of raising it.  

I didn’t vote for Labour Party to come into power, and now as I see what havoc the years of leadership under Tony Blair have created, I feel somewhat justified in my first opinion that it wasn’t in the best interests of the country for him to take control out of the Tory hands.  I’m from a traditional working class background in the North East of England and if someone from my part of the world thinks that a Labour Prime Minister isn’t the best thing for the country, then there’s something wrong!  

I can’t think of one event over the entire period of his being Prime Minister where I can think “he did a good job there”.  Nothing positive stands out at all, well except for the birth of the baby whilst at
Downing Street!  If there was something he’d been positively responsible for that had been overshadowed by the war in
Iraq, that would have been fair enough – but that fiasco just seems to sum up the entire period in office.  

Last time there was a good reason for a change in Government it was because the Tory party had no strong leader to step up and say “I can run this country well” in a convincing enough tone.  I think we’re at this place again, only it’s Labour Party who is weak – the only thing that bothers me is that I don’t know whether the Conservative Party have managed to create a strong leader in the time it’s been out of power.  It could be time for the Liberal Democrats to show what they’re made of and create a stir at the polls next General Election.  

Meanwhile, let’s hope that Tony Blair can manage to leave office with the same conviction he led us into war, swiftly and without consultation with the people who believed in him enough to put the future of our country in his hands.

Things seem good on the work front.
Check out the design on the oak masters pages

In yet another sign of the worsening conditions in
Iraq, suicide bombers have added chemical weapons to their arsenals, driving trucks full of chlorine gas into busy areas in Ramadi and Fallujah. At least eight people were killed, and 350 more were forced to hospital to receive treatment for burned lungs and skin.

Although the death toll was not as high as other suicide bombings, the three attacks were a true act of terrorism, since the fear of chemical warfare is strong in the Iraqi people. They have had to face gas attacks first-hand in the past.

It is so sad that the best minds in the
UK And US alike have not been able to find a solution in
Iraq That leads to less violence instead of more. The “surge” of additional troops in the area had seemed to have a positive effect before these attacks, and the
US Was attempting to win over civilians by opening medical centers.

However, it is hard to mark true progress when it takes hundreds or thousands of people to increase security, and only a few to wreak havoc.

One way or another, something needs to be done in the area – and soon. Why can’t our leaders manage to come up with a sound and workable plan?

Ow on a work front.
I've completed the eshot pages